what to do if you have the same footnote twice

I've writing an essay and in one paragraph, I'm talking nigh ii lines of evidence for conditions required for life on Mars and source for both is a unmarried newspaper. Practise I reference the newspaper twice (in the text body), one time later each line of evidence, or would I only mention it in one case at the end of the paragraph? My concern is that I've written a few sentences about each and then it might not be obvious if I merely reference information technology once, simply information technology looks strange if I'm referencing the same matter twice so close together.

(Original post by Plagioclase)
I've writing an essay and in ane paragraph, I'm talking about two lines of evidence for conditions required for life on Mars and source for both is a single newspaper. Exercise I reference the paper twice (in the text body), once after each line of evidence, or would I only mention it once at the stop of the paragraph? My concern is that I've written a few sentences most each so it might not be obvious if I only reference it once, but it looks foreign if I'1000 referencing the aforementioned thing twice so close together.

I've always done reference the first time, then don't mention the second if it's immediately afterwards. If you lot use some other source in between, reference again.

Fish is practiced (Bob, 2006). Fish live in the ocean (Bob again, simply we don't demand to include this). Fish don't have legs (Sam, 1990). Fish accept fins (Bob, 2006).

(Original mail service past Plagioclase)
I've writing an essay and in 1 paragraph, I'1000 talking about two lines of bear witness for conditions required for life on Mars and source for both is a unmarried paper. Do I reference the newspaper twice (in the text body), once after each line of show, or would I only mention it one time at the finish of the paragraph? My concern is that I've written a few sentences most each so it might not exist obvious if I just reference it once, but it looks strange if I'm referencing the same thing twice so close together.

One reference after each line of prove so it's clearer I think

(Original post by Plagioclase)
I've writing an essay and in one paragraph, I'chiliad talking about ii lines of prove for atmospheric condition required for life on Mars and source for both is a unmarried paper. Do I reference the paper twice (in the text trunk), once later each line of evidence, or would I only mention information technology one time at the end of the paragraph? My business concern is that I've written a few sentences nearly each and so it might non exist obvious if I merely reference it once, merely information technology looks strange if I'm referencing the same thing twice so shut together.

What kind of referencing are you using? If it's Harvard, you can just put ibid at the second reference if it's the same every bit the previous ane.

(Original post by Puddles the Monkey)
What kind of referencing are you using? If it'southward Harvard, you can just put ibid at the 2d reference if it's the same equally the previous one.

Only about to annotate this! Y'all can likewise employ ibid to reference a source yous've used further before likewise, for example:

1. JK Rowling
2. Charles Darwin
iii. ibid. meet reference i
iv. Charles Dickens

Sorry for the rudimentary instance but hopefully you get the point

See hither for much ameliorate explanation

(Original mail by Puddles the Monkey)
What kind of referencing are y'all using? If information technology'south Harvard, y'all can simply put ibid at the second reference if it'southward the aforementioned as the previous one.

(Original postal service by antigone-)
Only virtually to comment this! Yous can also apply ibid to reference a source you lot've used further before likewise, for example:

1. JK Rowling
two. Charles Darwin
3. ibid. see reference 1
four. Charles Dickens

Pitiful for the rudimentary example but hopefully yous go the point

See here for much better explanation

Thanks! That's very useful!

You tin also express the reference in a slightly different style then it seems less 'clunky':

Fish are small-scale (Bob 2006). The ocean is big (Sam 1990) so Bob draws the conclusion (2006) that there are lots of fish.

Depends on the system used at your uni - the issue should be covered in your uni's referencing guide if they have one. At my undergrad uni we used a tailored version of Harvard. To confuse the consequence, the guidelines brash the employ of ibid for repeat references to the same source. However a few lecturers advised against using information technology as it was "old fashioned" and four years later the guidelines don't mention ibid at all.

Personally, I e'er prefer to reference each statement individually where the appropriate guide permits. I tend to shuffle things effectually quite a lot as I edit, and using ibid occasionally left me with "orphaned" statements referenced as ibid when I'd separated them from the original preceding statement. If you're going to use ibid, I'd suggest referencing statements individually and going through the text to substitute ibid every bit ane of your terminal edits.

kriegeranthery.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=3712863

Share this post